Your Cookies are Disabled! NationalNotary.org sets cookies on your computer to help improve performance and provide a more engaging user experience. By using this site, you accept the terms of our cookie policy. Learn more.

Why Legal Professionals Must Take The Notary Stamp Seriously

We sometimes forget that our seals of office serve a significant purpose. The seal is such a key feature of notarization that the Notary Public Code of Professional Responsibility specifically addresses it, as follows: “The Notary shall affix a seal on every notarized document and not allow this universally recognized symbol of office to be used by another or in an endorsement or promotion.” This ethical obligation applies to all Notaries, even those in states that do not at present statutorily require their Notaries to affix seal impressions on documents, for several reasons.

First, affixing a seal as part of the notarization of a signature on a document constitutes a tangible link between today’s Notaries and those dating to ancient Rome, early Europe and colonial America. The office of Notary in those eras was a post of prominence, occupied by an individual of consequence and honor in the community. All of those historic Notaries utilized a seal in performing their official acts, and the continued use of the modern ink-stamp seal maintains this tradition. Tradition, and the honor, integrity and respect that go hand-in-hand with it, are important.

Second, notarization is not trivial; it is not a mere technicality. The underlying transactions that are involved in many notarizations are of great significance to the document signers. The Notary’s manner should reflect the importance of the occasion, and accordingly a proper sense of decorum and ceremony should be instilled to help assure that the signer knows what he or she is undertaking. The use of the “extra” feature of a seal adds a dimension to the notarial ceremony.

Third, the presence of the Notary seal creates one more obstacle in the way of would-be wrongdoers bent on document fraud. Imperfect tampering with or reproduction of a Notary seal impression may expose the attempt to defraud. Indeed, if the wrongdoers obtain or counterfeit a false Notary seal, in most jurisdictions that misconduct will constitute a separate crime for which they could be prosecuted.

Fourth, a valuable purpose is served by the seal impression on a document in those jurisdictions which require the Notary commission expiration date to be imprinted as part of the text of the seal. With more than four million Notaries in this country, thousands of Notary commissions expire every day, and not all Notaries independently remember their commission expiration dates. If the expiration date appears as part of the language of the seal, there is a greater chance that either the Notary or someone else at the notarization ceremony will notice if the unfortunate occurrence has taken place that the Notary’s commission has ended. Then, another qualified Notary may be found to perform the notarization in a timely fashion.

Fifth, in jurisdictions which require personal identification information in the text of the seal, such as the name of the Notary and the Notary commission number, the seal provides an important record. Sometimes, Notaries will not be personally known to document signers, or remembered by those signers months or years later if they need to contact the Notaries. With the information contained in some Notary seals, Notaries can be identified and then located if circumstances warrant those steps.

Sixth, the affixation of a Notary seal provides a visible sign of a document’s acceptability. In our highly fluid and mobile world, many documents travel across state and national borders, and are then presented for recording or to serve as evidence, or otherwise sought to be recognized by business or governmental agents. If a document bears an easily recognized notarization, it will be more readily accepted and approved.

Notaries in states that do not require seals are not prohibited from using them as part of the notarization process, and hopefully are abiding by their ethical duty to affix a seal for all official acts.

Michael Closen is Professor Emeritus at the John Marshall Law School in Chicago, Illinois. A respected consultant on model Notary statutes and legislation, Closen served on the drafting committees for the 1998 Notary Public Code of Professional Responsibility, the 2002 Model Notary Act, and the 2010 Model Notary Act.

3 Comments

Add your comment

Mr. J

23 Jul 2024

Yes Faith B, in fact there is no one single universal oath that all medical doctors are held to. The Hippocratic Oath in its original form is antiquated and obsolete for a number of reasons as it has little relevance to the modern practice of medicine: swearing before a pantheon of ancient Greek gods that the modern physician likely does not believe in, promising to teach the art of medicine *for free* to the children of the physician's teacher, and cautioning physicians *not* to perform surgery, because in ancient times surgery was considered manual labor in the domain of barber-surgeons, and not physicians. The "do no harm" concept that popular culture associates with the Hippocratic Oath only gets a brief mention toward the middle, and was possibly a later insertion. Today there are a variety of professional oaths administered by medical schools. Some use a modernized variation of the Hippocratic Oath, some use the 1948 Declaration of Geneva, and some use an oath that the school came up with themselves. And many use an oath that was formulated by the graduating students themselves. Among all these oaths, there is notable variation in how medical responsibilities are considered, as well as what may be specifically mentioned as unethical or not. And then there is the whole matter of legalities, as law does not always line up perfectly with ethics. I said nothing about making things mediocre. Those are your words, not mine as you seem to be selectively reading what I originally wrote and disregarding my main point. We should not just blindly accept these things just for the sake of "tradition" and "honor." Rather, we should use our ability to think and analyze, and IMPROVE on what came before.

Faith B

24 Aug 2020

Just came across this and wonder why Mr. J believes that we should relegate historical fact and tradition as a mere 'footnote". I don't read footnotes, do you? I am grateful for the reminder that this was a NOBLE profession - too often in the modern age, we reduce everything to mediocrity and expect nothing above the common denominator to be evidenced in our behavior and professional conduct. So I thank you for reminding me of this history of our profession. Surely Doctors should throw the Hippocratic Oath out the window then, using the same reasoning as Mr. J?

Mr. J

29 Sep 2014

The second through sixth reasons actually have high relevance for the twenty-first century. But I think the whole "tradition" line of reasoning should either be stricken completely, or reduced to a tiny footnote for those interested in historical context. We do not live in ancient Rome, and we should not be bound by archaic notions of "honor" and "tradition" from a brutal, militaristic empire that died centuries ago. "Tradition" can be used to justify all sorts obsolete and unjust practices. In today's day and age, it is vital to use our critical thinking skills and constantly re-examine and re-define our thinking and our roles, instead of automatically accepting hoary traditions from antiquity.

Leave a Comment

Required *

All comments are reviewed and if approved, will display.

Close