Summary With Senate File 2265, Iowa becomes the second state to enact the Revised Uniform Law on Notarial Acts (RULONA). SF 2265 contains most of the “stock” RULONA provisions, including new identification standards, prohibited acts, and electronic notarization rules. The RULONA does not contain the bracketed (optional) Notary bond, journal and education provisions that were in the final form of the RULONA adopted by the Uniform Law Commission. The bill takes effect on January 1, 2013.
AnalysisThe state of Iowa becomes the second state to enact the Revised Uniform Law on Notarial Acts (RULONA).
Senate File 2265 creates a new Chapter 9B in the Iowa Code and repeals the previous Chapter 9E. Chapter 9E included the predecessor act to the RULONA, the Uniform Law on Notarial Acts. SF 2265 contains many of the “stock” RULONA provisions including prohibited acts, grounds for administrative actions taken by the Secretary of State against the commission of a Notary, new standards for identifying document signers, and an all-important rule that all document signers must personally appear before the notarial officer for a paper-based and electronic notarial act. Interestingly, in recognizing the notarial acts of notarial officers in other U.S. states, the new law specifically states that the notarial act performed in another state must be performed with the signer must be physically present before the Notary. This means that any electronic notarizations performed under Virginia law utilizing video and audio technology will be rejected in the state of Iowa, because Iowa does not define personal appearance to include appearance by alternative technologies.
SF 2265 also includes the stock RULONA provisions allowing a Notary to refuse to perform a notarial act if the Notary is not satisfied that the signer is competent to sign or has not signed the document voluntarily and requiring a Notary to complete a notarial certificate contemporaneously with the performance of the notarial act and sign a certificate only after the notarial act has been completed. The bill also contains the RULONA prohibition against a Notary engaging in the unauthorized practice of law, the disqualification from notarizing when the Notary or the Notary’s spouse is a party to the document, and allowance for a document signer with a physical limitation to direct someone other than the Notary to sign the document for the disabled signer.
With respect to electronic notarizations, a Notary may use any technology to perform an electronic notarial act as long as it is “tamper-evident,” that is, the technology must be able to visibly show if a record has been changed after the Notary’s signature has been affixed to the electronic record.
Read Senate File 2265.