Summary
In an effort to stem abuse and fraud in the statewide citizen-initiated petition process, Colorado HB 09-1326 sets stringent procedures for the notarization of a circulator’s affidavit, imposes penalties for fraud and permits electors to commence civil actions against persons, including Notaries, who perpetrate fraud.
Notary and notarization provisions take effect May 15, 2009. Other sections of the bill take effect July 1, 2009 and January 1, 2010.
AffectsCreates Section 1-40-135 in and amends Sections 1-40-102, 1-40-106, 1-5-407, 1-40-101, 1-40-102, 1-40-106, 1-40-107, 1-40-108, 1-40-109, 1-40-110, 1-40-111, 1-40-112, 1-40-113, 1-40-115, 1-40-115, 1-40-117, 1-40-118, 1-40-121, 1-40-130, 1-40-134, and 32-9-119.3 of the Colorado Revised Statutes.
AnalysisCiting certain abuses and frauds during the 2008 general election — including problems with the notarization of circulator’s affidavits, the Colorado General Assembly has passed major reforms to the laws governing the statewide citizen-initiated petition process. In order to have an initiative on the ballot, circulators must obtain the necessary number of signatures of qualified electors and then have their signatures notarized. House Bill 09-1326 prohibits a Notary from notarizing the signature of a circulator unless the circulator is in the Notary’s presence and has properly dated and supplied the personal information needed. In addition, the Notary is prohibited from notarizing the affidavit unless the circulator provides a qualifying identification document with a Colorado residence address and the Notary writes this identification on the affidavit. This latter requirement is problematic from the standpoint that certain IDs a circulator could present to the Notary — a copy of a current utility bill, bank statement, government check, paycheck, or other government document that shows the name and address of the elector — do not meet the requirement of the law for a notarization generally. In order to perform a notarial act under CRS 12-55-110, an ID must be a current identification card or document issued by a federal or state government entity containing a photograph and signature. Thus, CRS 1-40-111(2)(b)(i)(C) as amended by the Act must be understood to present a requirement for an additional type of ID for the proper notarization of the circulator’s affidavit, if that ID is not an identification document acceptable under CRS 12-55-110. HB 09-1326 also strengthens penalties for frauds involving circulator’s affidavits — up to a $1,500 fine and imprisonment for a year, or both. With the new notarization provisions, these penalties would apply to a Notary who performs a notarization on a circulator’s affidavit in violation of the statute. Equally applicable to Notaries is a new provision allowing any registered elector to commence a civil action to recover reasonable attorney fees and costs from any person found by the district court to have committed fraud with regard to petition circulation, invalid signatures or petition sections. As for the improper notarizations performed on circulator’s affidavits, the new law is very clear in stating that these notarial acts are invalid and must be rejected by the Secretary of State.
Read House Bill 09-1326.